Omniscia Kinza Finance Audit
Manual Review
Manual Review
A thorough line-by-line review was conducted on the codebase to identify potential malfunctions and vulnerabilities in Kinza Finance's wrapped asset system.
As the project at hand implements wrapper contracts, intricate care was put into ensuring that the flow of funds within the system conforms to the specifications and restrictions laid forth within the protocol's specification.
We validated that all state transitions of the system occur within sane criteria and that all rudimentary formulas within the system execute as expected. We pinpointed a potential Denial-of-Service attack within the system which could have had minor ramifications to its overall operation.
Additionally, the system was investigated for any other commonly present attack vectors such as re-entrancy attacks, mathematical truncations, logical flaws and ERC / EIP standard inconsistencies. The documentation of the project was satisfactory to the extent it need be.
A total of 11 findings were identified over the course of the manual review of which 7 findings concerned the behaviour and security of the system. The non-security related findings, such as optimizations, are included in the separate Code Style chapter.
The finding table below enumerates all these security / behavioural findings:
ID | Severity | Addressed | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PER-01M | Potentially Incompatible Code | ||
PEC-01M | Potential Withdrawal Denial-of-Service | ||
PEC-02M | Potentially Incompatible Approval Methodologies | ||
PEC-03M | Potentially Inaccurate Maximum Withdrawal Mechanism | ||
PNT-01M | Inexistent Renewal of Approvals | ||
PNT-02M | Potential Withdrawal Denial-of-Service | ||
PNT-03M | Potentially Inaccurate Maximum Withdrawal Mechanism |