Omniscia Xcaliswap Audit
VotingEscrow Static Analysis Findings
VotingEscrow Static Analysis Findings
VEW-01S: Inexistent Sanitization of Input Address
Type | Severity | Location |
---|---|---|
Input Sanitization | ![]() | VotingEscrow.sol:L118-L120 |
Description:
The linked function accepts an address
argument yet does not properly sanitize it.
Impact:
The presence of zero-value addresses, especially in constructor
implementations, can cause the contract to be permanently inoperable. These checks are advised as zero-value inputs are a common side-effect of off-chain software related bugs.
Example:
contracts/periphery/VotingEscrow.sol
118constructor(119 address token_addr120) {121 token = token_addr;122 voter = msg.sender;123 point_history[0].blk = block.number;124 point_history[0].ts = block.timestamp;125
126 supportedInterfaces[ERC165_INTERFACE_ID] = true;127 supportedInterfaces[ERC721_INTERFACE_ID] = true;128 supportedInterfaces[ERC721_METADATA_INTERFACE_ID] = true;129
130 // mint-ish131 emit Transfer(address(0), address(this), tokenId);132 // burn-ish133 emit Transfer(address(this), address(0), tokenId);134}
Recommendation:
We advise some basic sanitization to be put in place by ensuring that the address
specified is non-zero.
Alleviation:
The Xcaliswap team has introduced a require
check ensuring that the address specified is non-zero.